Why are big games building on Avalanche instead of Ethereum?
High-profile games like FIFA and Maplestory have turned to Avalanche for their chains, leveraging the network's recent upgrade, Avalanche9000, which restructured validator economics by introducing a low-cost, pay-as-you-go model. This significant reduction in upfront costs, alongside the ability to utilize the liquidity of the C-Chain, makes launching a sovereign Avalanche L1 chain financially appealing. Teams can access essential infrastructure without incurring high integration fees, streamlining their go-to-market strategies. Unlike Ethereum Layer 2s, which lack robust value accrual mechanisms for their tokens, Avalanche L1s can build distinct value streams through validator rewards and gas fees. The enhancements from AvaCloud's HyperSDK further facilitate better performance compared to current L2 rollups. Additionally, Avalanche's strategy to minimize initial costs aligns with their vision for sustainable long-term growth, as demonstrated by recent fee reductions and upcoming technical improvements. With an increasing number of active L1s, Avalanche shows promise in developing its own network effect, focusing on the practical benefits of lower fees and easier integration.
Source 🔗