House Democrats raised concerns during a recent hearing about the potential implications of the CLARITY Act, a proposed framework for regulating the digital assets industry. Experts highlighted that this legislation might not only affect cryptocurrencies but could lead traditional finance institutions to exploit regulatory gaps, allowing them to shift operations onto blockchain without oversight. Amanda Fischer from Better Markets emphasized that the bill's design might motivate firms to avoid compliance costs associated with securities regulations by adopting blockchain for common functions like capital raising, bypassing important consumer protections. She pointed out that the two-tiered system for categorizing crypto assets in the Act could incentivize issuers to classify their tokens as commodities to evade regulation rather than pursue the more rigorous SEC registration process. Despite substantive criticisms of the bill, Republican leaders mostly focused on opposing Democratic concerns about including provisions that would prevent former President Trump from profiting from crypto ventures while in office, which detracted from the debate on the bill’s merits. Overall, the CLARITY Act’s potential to reshape the regulatory landscape for both crypto and traditional finance drew significant scrutiny.

Source 🔗