Crypto has a regulatory capture problem in Washington — Or does it?
The crypto industry's influence in Washington DC raises concerns about regulatory capture, where lawmakers and regulators prioritize the interests of a specific constituency over the public good. This growing lobbying power may lead to favorable legislation for the crypto sector, but it risks diminishing competition within the industry and overlooking broader economic risks. Recent discussions among U.S. senators and crypto advocates highlight worries about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding legislation around stablecoins. Critics argue that Coinbase's influence could unfairly limit competition by sidelining rivals like Tether. The regulatory landscape appears conducive to regulatory capture, with accusations of both the Trump and Biden administrations favoring particular interests over fair competition. The concept of regulatory capture is not new in Washington but is particularly potent in the context of emerging technologies like cryptocurrency, where the balance between innovation and regulation is crucial for consumer protection and market fairness.
Source 🔗