Anthropic's Claude 4 models excel in coding and reasoning tasks but face challenges in multimodality and context window size compared to competitors like Google and OpenAI. The new models retain a 200,000-token limit and a primarily text-based approach. Testing showed Claude 4 achieving marginal improvements in creative writing, where it outperformed in narrative construction, and in coding, where it generated a more complex game than its rival, Gemini. However, it lagged in mathematical reasoning, with OpenAI's o3 model achieving perfect accuracy. Claude also struggled with context retrieval, being unable to process longer documents due to its token limit, which poses issues for users handling extensive text. Overall, while Claude 4 is strong in certain areas, its limitations suggest it may not meet the needs of users requiring extensive document processing or multimedia capabilities. It's ideal for creative writers and developers, but less suitable for novices seeking a full AI experience.

Source 🔗